linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/12] perf/x86/intel: Add perf core PMU support for Sapphire Rapids

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0272153e-f2a5-67df-9402-16d3cc118713@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:21:21 -0500
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        eranian@...gle.com, namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] perf/x86/intel: Add perf core PMU support for
 Sapphire Rapids



On 1/26/2021 10:37 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:38:22PM -0800, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>> @@ -1577,9 +1668,20 @@ static void setup_pebs_adaptive_sample_data(struct perf_event *event,
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	if (format_size & PEBS_DATACFG_MEMINFO) {
>> +		if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT) {
>> +			u64 weight = meminfo->latency;
>> +
>> +			if (x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_INSTR_LATENCY)
>> +				weight >>= PEBS_CACHE_LATENCY_OFFSET;
>> +			data->weight = weight & PEBS_LATENCY_MASK ?:
>>   				intel_get_tsx_weight(meminfo->tsx_tuning);
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_EXT) {
>> +			data->weight_ext.val = 0;
>> +			if (x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_INSTR_LATENCY)
>> +				data->weight_ext.instr_latency = meminfo->latency & PEBS_LATENCY_MASK;
>> +		}
>>   
>>   		if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC)
>>   			data->data_src.val = get_data_src(event, meminfo->aux);
> 
> Talk to me about that SAMPLE_WEIGHT stuff.... I'm not liking it.
> 
> Sure you want multiple dimensions, but urgh.
> 
> Also, afaict, as proposed you're wasting 80/128 bits. That is, all data
> you want to export fits in a single u64 and yet you're using two, which
> is mighty daft.
> 
> Sure, pebs::lat / pebs_meminfo::latency is defined as a u64, but you
> can't tell me that that is ever actually more than 4G cycles. Even the
> TSX block latency is u32.
> 
> So how about defining SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT which uses the exact same
> data as SAMPLE_WEIGHT but unions it with a struct. I'm not sure if we
> want:
> 
> union sample_weight {
> 	u64 weight;
> 
> 	struct {
> 		u32	low_dword;
> 		u32	high_dword;
> 	};
> 
> 	/* or */
> 
> 	struct {
> 		u32	low_dword;
> 		u16	high_word;
> 		u16	higher_word;
> 	};
> };
> 
> Then have the core code enforce SAMPLE_WEIGHT ^ SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT and
> make the existing code never set the high dword.

So the kernel will only accept either SAMPLE_WEIGHT type or 
SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT type. It should error out if both types are set, right?

I will check if u32 is enough for meminfo::latency on the previous 
platforms.

Thanks,
Kan