[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YA6jtyrbxCSRk/zD@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:55:51 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:03:24AM +0800, Like Xu wrote:
> Clean up that CONFIG_RETPOLINE crud and replace the
> indirect call x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs with static_call().
>
Looks good in principle, but the robot complains about a missing func
decl. I think you removed a little too much when you killed the inline
thing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists