[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210126072443.33066-12-foxhlchen@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:24:42 +0800
From: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>
To: corbet@....net, vegard.nossum@...cle.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
rdunlap@...radead.org, grandmaster@...klimov.de
Cc: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] docs: path-lookup: update get_link() ->follow_link description
get_link() is merged into pick_link(). i_op->follow_link is
replaced with i_op->get_link(). get_link() can return ERR_PTR(0)
which equals NULL.
Signed-off-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>
---
Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst
index 921779a4636f..2bb3ca486acd 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst
@@ -1137,10 +1137,10 @@ Symlinks with no final component
A pair of special-case symlinks deserve a little further explanation.
Both result in a new ``struct path`` (with mount and dentry) being set
-up in the ``nameidata``, and result in ``get_link()`` returning ``NULL``.
+up in the ``nameidata``, and result in ``pick_link()`` returning ``NULL``.
The more obvious case is a symlink to "``/``". All symlinks starting
-with "``/``" are detected in ``get_link()`` which resets the ``nameidata``
+with "``/``" are detected in ``pick_link()`` which resets the ``nameidata``
to point to the effective filesystem root. If the symlink only
contains "``/``" then there is nothing more to do, no components at all,
so ``NULL`` is returned to indicate that the symlink can be released and
@@ -1157,12 +1157,11 @@ something that looks like a symlink. It is really a reference to the
target file, not just the name of it. When you ``readlink`` these
objects you get a name that might refer to the same file - unless it
has been unlinked or mounted over. When ``walk_component()`` follows
-one of these, the ``->follow_link()`` method in "procfs" doesn't return
+one of these, the ``->get_link()`` method in "procfs" doesn't return
a string name, but instead calls ``nd_jump_link()`` which updates the
-``nameidata`` in place to point to that target. ``->follow_link()`` then
-returns ``NULL``. Again there is no final component and ``get_link()``
-reports this by leaving the ``last_type`` field of ``nameidata`` as
-``LAST_BIND``.
+``nameidata`` in place to point to that target. ``->get_link()`` then
+returns ``0``. Again there is no final component and ``pick_link()``
+returns NULL.
Following the symlink in the final component
--------------------------------------------
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists