linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] kcsan: Switch to KUNIT_CASE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:15:04 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        boqun.feng@...il.com, kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kcsan: Switch to KUNIT_CASE_PARAM for parameterized
 tests

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:35:47PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:06 AM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Since KUnit now support parameterized tests via KUNIT_CASE_PARAM, update
> > KCSAN's test to switch to it for parameterized tests. This simplifies
> > parameterized tests and gets rid of the "parameters in case name"
> > workaround (hack).
> >
> > At the same time, we can increase the maximum number of threads used,
> > because on systems with too few CPUs, KUnit allows us to now stop at the
> > maximum useful threads and not unnecessarily execute redundant test
> > cases with (the same) limited threads as had been the case before.
> >
> > Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> > ---
> 
> Thanks! This looks great from the KUnit point of view: I'm
> particularly excited to see a use of the parameterised test generator
> that's not just reading from an array.
> 
> I tested this as well, and it all seemed to work fine for me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

I applied both Reviewed-by tags, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul