linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/199] 5.10.11-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:36:03 -0600
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        pavel@...x.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/199] 5.10.11-rc1 review

Hello!


On 1/25/21 12:37 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.11 release.
> There are 199 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 27 Jan 2021 18:31:44 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.11-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Sanity results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regressions detected.

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 5.10.11-rc1
git repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
git branch: linux-5.10.y
git commit: efec2624e657b370b1621e8514a1fa6d65eb20a0
git describe: v5.10.10-200-gefec2624e657
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y-sanity/build/v5.10.10-200-gefec2624e657

Regressions (compared to build v5.10.10)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

x86_64:
   build:
     * clang-10-allnoconfig
     * clang-10-tinyconfig
     * gcc-8-allnoconfig
     * gcc-8-tinyconfig
     * gcc-9-allnoconfig
     * gcc-9-tinyconfig
     * gcc-10-allnoconfig
     * gcc-10-tinyconfig

i386:
   build:
     * clang-10-allnoconfig
     * clang-10-tinyconfig
     * clang-11-allnoconfig
     * clang-11-tinyconfig
     * gcc-8-allnoconfig
     * gcc-8-tinyconfig
     * gcc-9-allnoconfig
     * gcc-9-tinyconfig
     * gcc-10-allnoconfig
     * gcc-10-tinyconfig


No fixes (compared to build v5.10.10)

Ran 704 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- arc
- arm
- arm64
- i386
- juno-r2
- mips
- parisc
- powerpc
- riscv
- s390
- sh
- sparc
- x15
- x86
- x86_64

Test Suites
-----------
* build
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-smoketest-tests


Errors look like the following:

   make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=x86_64 CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc' 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc'
   /builds/1nZbYji0zW0SkEnWMrDznWWzerI/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c: In function 'bsp_init_amd':
   /builds/1nZbYji0zW0SkEnWMrDznWWzerI/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c:572:3: error: '__max_die_per_package' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'topology_max_die_per_package'?
     572 |   __max_die_per_package = nodes_per_socket = ((ecx >> 8) & 7) + 1;
         |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |   topology_max_die_per_package

Will find out more soon.

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org