[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YA7hVQVTXT554cKN@builder.lan>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:18:45 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
agross@...nel.org, mchehab@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: venus: core: Add sdm660 DT compatible and
resource struct
On Mon 25 Jan 08:51 CST 2021, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 25/01/21 11:40, Hans Verkuil ha scritto:
> > On 18/01/2021 18:45, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > > Il 18/01/21 18:21, Stanimir Varbanov ha scritto:
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
[..]
> > > > > + .fwname = "qcom/venus-4.4/venus.mdt",
[..]
> > This patch can't be merged unless there is a corresponding firmware available
> > in linux-firmware. Is the current 4.2 firmware in linux-firmware signed by
> > Qualcomm? Can they provided 4.4 firmware as well?
> >
>
> If there is such issue, then maybe we should do "something" about it: I
> would then propose to remove all references to fwname and just get this
> done in DT, where every qcom board already specifies its own path for
> its own firmware.
>
We have the same problem with production devices on e.g. SDM845, where
the firmware referenced by fw_name and present in linux-firmware won't
work on any real devices.
As such, providing means for specifying the firmware name in DT would be
a very reasonable thing, and in line with how we handle this in other
subsystems (using the firmware-name property, containing the full
relative path).
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists