lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:34:17 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        ben.widawsky@...el.com, cl@...ux.com, alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com,
        tobin@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, cai@....pw, dwagner@...e.de,
        osalvador@...e.de
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 03/13] mm/vmscan: replace implicit RECLAIM_ZONE checks with explicit checks


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>

RECLAIM_ZONE was assumed to be unused because it was never explicitly
used in the kernel.  However, there were a number of places where it
was checked implicitly by checking 'node_reclaim_mode' for a zero
value.

These zero checks are not great because it is not obvious what a zero
mode *means* in the code.  Replace them with a helper which makes it
more obvious: node_reclaim_enabled().

This helper also provides a handy place to explicitly check the
RECLAIM_ZONE bit itself.  Check it explicitly there to make it more
obvious where the bit can affect behavior.

This should have no functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
Cc: osalvador <osalvador@...e.de>

--

Note: This is not cc'd to stable.  It does not fix any bugs.
---

 b/include/linux/swap.h |    7 +++++++
 b/mm/khugepaged.c      |    2 +-
 b/mm/page_alloc.c      |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN include/linux/swap.h~mm-vmscan-node_reclaim_mode_helper include/linux/swap.h
--- a/include/linux/swap.h~mm-vmscan-node_reclaim_mode_helper	2021-01-25 16:23:08.330866712 -0800
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h	2021-01-25 16:23:08.339866712 -0800
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <linux/page-flags.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/mempolicy.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
 
 struct notifier_block;
@@ -380,6 +381,12 @@ extern int sysctl_min_slab_ratio;
 #define node_reclaim_mode 0
 #endif
 
+static inline bool node_reclaim_enabled(void)
+{
+	/* Is any node_reclaim_mode bit set? */
+	return node_reclaim_mode & (RECLAIM_ZONE|RECLAIM_WRITE|RECLAIM_UNMAP);
+}
+
 extern void check_move_unevictable_pages(struct pagevec *pvec);
 
 extern int kswapd_run(int nid);
diff -puN mm/khugepaged.c~mm-vmscan-node_reclaim_mode_helper mm/khugepaged.c
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c~mm-vmscan-node_reclaim_mode_helper	2021-01-25 16:23:08.332866712 -0800
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c	2021-01-25 16:23:08.340866712 -0800
@@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ static bool khugepaged_scan_abort(int ni
 	 * If node_reclaim_mode is disabled, then no extra effort is made to
 	 * allocate memory locally.
 	 */
-	if (!node_reclaim_mode)
+	if (!node_reclaim_enabled())
 		return false;
 
 	/* If there is a count for this node already, it must be acceptable */
diff -puN mm/page_alloc.c~mm-vmscan-node_reclaim_mode_helper mm/page_alloc.c
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-vmscan-node_reclaim_mode_helper	2021-01-25 16:23:08.335866712 -0800
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c	2021-01-25 16:23:08.342866712 -0800
@@ -3875,7 +3875,7 @@ retry:
 			if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS)
 				goto try_this_zone;
 
-			if (node_reclaim_mode == 0 ||
+			if (!node_reclaim_enabled() ||
 			    !zone_allows_reclaim(ac->preferred_zoneref->zone, zone))
 				continue;
 
_

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ