[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210125183222.790837209@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:39:38 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 156/199] locking/lockdep: Cure noinstr fail
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
commit 0afda3a888dccf12557b41ef42eee942327d122b upstream.
When the compiler doesn't feel like inlining, it causes a noinstr
fail:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: lock_is_held_type()+0xb: call to lockdep_enabled() leaves .noinstr.text section
Fixes: 4d004099a668 ("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210106144017.592595176@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ module_param(lock_stat, int, 0644);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, lockdep_recursion);
EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_recursion);
-static inline bool lockdep_enabled(void)
+static __always_inline bool lockdep_enabled(void)
{
if (!debug_locks)
return false;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists