[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210125183219.855785587@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:38:27 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 085/199] scsi: ufs: Fix tm request when non-fatal error happens
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
[ Upstream commit eeb1b55b6e25c5f7265ff45cd050f3bc2cc423a4 ]
When non-fatal error like line-reset happens, ufshcd_err_handler() starts
to abort tasks by ufshcd_try_to_abort_task(). When it tries to issue a task
management request, we hit two warnings:
WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 7 at block/blk-core.c:630 blk_get_request+0x68/0x70
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 157 at block/blk-mq-tag.c:82 blk_mq_get_tag+0x438/0x46c
After fixing the above warnings we hit another tm_cmd timeout which may be
caused by unstable controller state:
__ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd: task management cmd 0x80 timed-out
Then, ufshcd_err_handler() enters full reset, and kernel gets stuck. It
turned out ufshcd_print_trs() printed too many messages on console which
requires CPU locks. Likewise hba->silence_err_logs, we need to avoid too
verbose messages. This is actually not an error case.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210107185316.788815-3-jaegeuk@kernel.org
Fixes: 69a6c269c097 ("scsi: ufs: Use blk_{get,put}_request() to allocate and free TMFs")
Reviewed-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 974a4f339ede2..8132893284670 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -4913,7 +4913,8 @@ ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
break;
} /* end of switch */
- if ((host_byte(result) != DID_OK) && !hba->silence_err_logs)
+ if ((host_byte(result) != DID_OK) &&
+ (host_byte(result) != DID_REQUEUE) && !hba->silence_err_logs)
ufshcd_print_trs(hba, 1 << lrbp->task_tag, true);
return result;
}
@@ -6208,9 +6209,13 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_intr(int irq, void *__hba)
intr_status = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
}
- if (enabled_intr_status && retval == IRQ_NONE) {
- dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Unhandled interrupt 0x%08x\n",
- __func__, intr_status);
+ if (enabled_intr_status && retval == IRQ_NONE &&
+ !ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba)) {
+ dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Unhandled interrupt 0x%08x (0x%08x, 0x%08x)\n",
+ __func__,
+ intr_status,
+ hba->ufs_stats.last_intr_status,
+ enabled_intr_status);
ufshcd_dump_regs(hba, 0, UFSHCI_REG_SPACE_SIZE, "host_regs: ");
}
@@ -6254,7 +6259,10 @@ static int __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
* Even though we use wait_event() which sleeps indefinitely,
* the maximum wait time is bounded by %TM_CMD_TIMEOUT.
*/
- req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED);
+ req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(req))
+ return PTR_ERR(req);
+
req->end_io_data = &wait;
free_slot = req->tag;
WARN_ON_ONCE(free_slot < 0 || free_slot >= hba->nutmrs);
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists