linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 183/199] pinctrl: qcom: Allow SoCs to specify a GPIO function thats not 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210125183223.904492276@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:40:05 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 183/199] pinctrl: qcom: Allow SoCs to specify a GPIO function thats not 0

From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

commit a82e537807d5c85706cd4c16fd2de77a8495dc8d upstream.

There's currently a comment in the code saying function 0 is GPIO.
Instead of hardcoding it, let's add a member where an SoC can specify
it.  No known SoCs use a number other than 0, but this just makes the
code clearer.  NOTE: no SoC code needs to be updated since we can rely
on zero-initialization.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Tested-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210114191601.v7.1.I3ad184e3423d8e479bc3e86f5b393abb1704a1d1@changeid
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c |    3 +--
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
@@ -210,8 +210,7 @@ static int msm_pinmux_request_gpio(struc
 	if (!g->nfuncs)
 		return 0;
 
-	/* For now assume function 0 is GPIO because it always is */
-	return msm_pinmux_set_mux(pctldev, g->funcs[0], offset);
+	return msm_pinmux_set_mux(pctldev, g->funcs[pctrl->soc->gpio_func], offset);
 }
 
 static const struct pinmux_ops msm_pinmux_ops = {
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ struct msm_gpio_wakeirq_map {
  * @wakeirq_dual_edge_errata: If true then GPIOs using the wakeirq_map need
  *                            to be aware that their parent can't handle dual
  *                            edge interrupts.
+ * @gpio_func: Which function number is GPIO (usually 0).
  */
 struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data {
 	const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
@@ -134,6 +135,7 @@ struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data {
 	const struct msm_gpio_wakeirq_map *wakeirq_map;
 	unsigned int nwakeirq_map;
 	bool wakeirq_dual_edge_errata;
+	unsigned int gpio_func;
 };
 
 extern const struct dev_pm_ops msm_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops;