[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YA8dEFSrHBb9muFr@google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:33:36 -0800
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, hyesoo.yu@...sung.com,
david@...hat.com, surenb@...gle.com, pullip.cho@...sung.com,
joaodias@...gle.com, hridya@...gle.com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
sumit.semwal@...aro.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mm: failfast mode with __GFP_NORETRY in
alloc_contig_range
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 02:12:00PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 21-01-21 09:55:00, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Contiguous memory allocation can be stalled due to waiting
> > on page writeback and/or page lock which causes unpredictable
> > delay. It's a unavoidable cost for the requestor to get *big*
> > contiguous memory but it's expensive for *small* contiguous
> > memory(e.g., order-4) because caller could retry the request
> > in different range where would have easy migratable pages
> > without stalling.
> >
> > This patch introduce __GFP_NORETRY as compaction gfp_mask in
> > alloc_contig_range so it will fail fast without blocking
> > when it encounters pages needed waiting.
>
> I am not against controling how hard this allocator tries with gfp mask
> but this changelog is rather void on any data and any user.
>
> It is also rather dubious to have retries when then caller says to not
> retry.
Since max_tries is 1 with ++tries, it shouldn't retry.
>
> Also why didn't you consider GFP_NOWAIT semantic for non blocking mode?
GFP_NOWAIT seems to be low(specific) flags rather than the one I want to
express. Even though I said only page writeback/lock in the description,
the goal is to avoid costly operations we might find later so such
"failfast", I thought GFP_NORETRY would be good fit.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 8 ++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index b031a5ae0bd5..1cdc3ee0b22e 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -8491,12 +8491,16 @@ static int __alloc_contig_migrate_range(struct compact_control *cc,
> > unsigned int nr_reclaimed;
> > unsigned long pfn = start;
> > unsigned int tries = 0;
> > + unsigned int max_tries = 5;
> > int ret = 0;
> > struct migration_target_control mtc = {
> > .nid = zone_to_nid(cc->zone),
> > .gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL,
> > };
> >
> > + if (cc->alloc_contig && cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC)
> > + max_tries = 1;
> > +
> > migrate_prep();
> >
> > while (pfn < end || !list_empty(&cc->migratepages)) {
> > @@ -8513,7 +8517,7 @@ static int __alloc_contig_migrate_range(struct compact_control *cc,
> > break;
> > }
> > tries = 0;
> > - } else if (++tries == 5) {
> > + } else if (++tries == max_tries) {
> > ret = ret < 0 ? ret : -EBUSY;
> > break;
> > }
> > @@ -8564,7 +8568,7 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> > .nr_migratepages = 0,
> > .order = -1,
> > .zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start)),
> > - .mode = MIGRATE_SYNC,
> > + .mode = gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY ? MIGRATE_ASYNC : MIGRATE_SYNC,
> > .ignore_skip_hint = true,
> > .no_set_skip_hint = true,
> > .gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask),
> > --
> > 2.30.0.296.g2bfb1c46d8-goog
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists