[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtB=vh0FzszeOS5ND4Voq3ck2AQgruF-4zC-K1hSSsbT_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:07:50 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Li Aubrey <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu()
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 13:02, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > @@ -6149,18 +6161,31 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
> > > }
> > >
> > > for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
> > > - if (!--nr)
> > > - return -1;
> > > - if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
> > > - break;
> > > + if (smt) {
> > > + i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
> > > + if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> > > + return i;
> > > +
> > > + } else {
> > > + if (!--nr)
> > > + return -1;
> > > + i = __select_idle_cpu(cpu);
> >
> > you should use idle_cpu directly instead of this intermediate i variable
> >
> > + idle_cpu = __select_idle_cpu(cpu);
> > + if ((unsigned int)idle_cpu < nr_cpumask_bits)
> > + break;
> >
> > Apart ths small comment above, the patch looks good to me and I
> > haven't any performance regression anymore
> >
>
> It's matching the code sequence in the SMT block. If we are going to make
> that change, then go the full way with this?
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 52a650aa2108..01e40e36c386 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6129,7 +6129,7 @@ static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpuma
> static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
> {
> struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
> - int i, cpu, idle_cpu = -1, nr = INT_MAX;
> + int cpu, idle_cpu = -1, nr = INT_MAX;
> bool smt = test_idle_cores(target, false);
> int this = smp_processor_id();
> struct sched_domain *this_sd;
> @@ -6162,18 +6162,16 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
>
> for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
> if (smt) {
> - i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
> - if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> - return i;
> + idle_cpu = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
but how do you differentiate idle core (return value) and an idle cpu
in the core set in &idle_cpu
You will return as soon as a cpu is idle and before testing all cores
> + if ((unsigned int)idle_cpu < nr_cpumask_bits)
> + return idle_cpu;
>
> } else {
> if (!--nr)
> return -1;
> - i = __select_idle_cpu(cpu);
> - if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits) {
> - idle_cpu = i;
> + idle_cpu = __select_idle_cpu(cpu);
> + if ((unsigned int)idle_cpu < nr_cpumask_bits)
> break;
> - }
> }
> }
>
>
> --
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists