[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YBFqAkQRig3oTdyd@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:26:26 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, sgoutham@...vell.com,
lcherian@...vell.com, gakula@...vell.com, jerinj@...vell.com,
sbhatta@...vell.com, Christina Jacob <cjacob@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 net-next 4/7] octeontx2-af: Physical link
configuration support
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 01:15:49PM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> From: Christina Jacob <cjacob@...vell.com>
>
> CGX LMAC, the physical interface support link configuration parameters
> like speed, auto negotiation, duplex etc. Firmware saves these into
> memory region shared between firmware and this driver.
>
> This patch adds mailbox handler set_link_mode, fw_data_get to
> configure and read these parameters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christina Jacob <cjacob@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.h | 2 +
> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx_fw_if.h | 18 ++++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h | 21 ++++++++
> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cgx.c | 17 ++++++
> 5 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c
> index b3ae84c..42ee67e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c
> @@ -658,6 +658,39 @@ static inline void cgx_link_usertable_init(void)
> cgx_lmactype_string[LMAC_MODE_USXGMII] = "USXGMII";
> }
>
> +static inline int cgx_link_usertable_index_map(int speed)
> +{
Hi Christina, Hariprasad
No inline functions in .c files please. Let the compiler decide.
> + switch (speed) {
> + case SPEED_10:
> + return CGX_LINK_10M;
> + case SPEED_100:
> + return CGX_LINK_100M;
> + case SPEED_1000:
> + return CGX_LINK_1G;
> + case SPEED_2500:
> + return CGX_LINK_2HG;
> + case SPEED_5000:
> + return CGX_LINK_5G;
> + case SPEED_10000:
> + return CGX_LINK_10G;
> + case SPEED_20000:
> + return CGX_LINK_20G;
> + case SPEED_25000:
> + return CGX_LINK_25G;
> + case SPEED_40000:
> + return CGX_LINK_40G;
> + case SPEED_50000:
> + return CGX_LINK_50G;
> + case 80000:
> + return CGX_LINK_80G;
> + case SPEED_100000:
> + return CGX_LINK_100G;
> + case SPEED_UNKNOWN:
> + return CGX_LINK_NONE;
> + }
> + return CGX_LINK_NONE;
> +}
> +
> static inline void link_status_user_format(u64 lstat,
> struct cgx_link_user_info *linfo,
> struct cgx *cgx, u8 lmac_id)
So it looks like previous reviews did not catch inline functions. So
lets say, no new inline functions.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists