[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOGqxeVmvW-sXs9SBu7MbiNjthDmKH0uK1gvHNNBie8miGRsCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:41:20 -0500
From: Alan Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"# 4.0+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: brcmstb: Fix sdhci_pltfm_suspend link error
> I just posted a new patch for this, please have a look and test it.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
I tested your new patch and it works.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>
Thanks
Al
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:55 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 18:40, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > +Nicolas,
> >
> > On 1/25/2021 4:50 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > >
> > > sdhci_pltfm_suspend() is only available when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > > support is built into the kernel, which caused a regression
> > > in a recent bugfix:
> > >
> > > ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: sdhci_pltfm_suspend
> > >>>> referenced by sdhci-brcmstb.c
> > >>>> mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.o:(sdhci_brcmstb_shutdown) in archive drivers/built-in.a
> > >
> > > Making the call conditional on the symbol fixes the link
> > > error.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 5b191dcba719 ("mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Fix mmc timeout errors on S5 suspend")
> > > Fixes: e7b5d63a82fe ("mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Add shutdown callback")
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > > ---
> > > It would be helpful if someone could test this to ensure that the
> > > driver works correctly even when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is disabled
> >
> > Why not create stubs for sdhci_pltfm_suspend() when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n? I
> > don't think this is going to be a functional issue given that the
> > purpose of having the .shutdown() function is to save power if we cannot
> > that is fine, too.
> > --
> > Florian
>
> I would prefer this approach - we shouldn't leave stub functions
> unimplemented, which is what looks to me.
>
> I just posted a new patch for this, please have a look and test it.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists