lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YBFyzX87hvpaYJWK@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:03:57 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Chen, Mike Ximing" <mike.ximing.chen@...el.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com" 
        <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/20] dlb: add device ioctl layer and first three
 ioctls

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 01:59:50PM +0000, Chen, Mike Ximing wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 7:29 AM
> > To: Chen, Mike Ximing <mike.ximing.chen@...el.com>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; arnd@...db.de; Williams, Dan J
> > <dan.j.williams@...el.com>; pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com; Gage Eads
> > <gage.eads@...el.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/20] dlb: add device ioctl layer and first three ioctls
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 01:01:22PM -0600, Mike Ximing Chen wrote:
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dlb.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > 
> > As the bot points out, this is an "odd" license for a uapi .h file, are
> > you SURE about this?
> > 
> > If so, I need an Intel lawyer's signed-off-by on it as well, so we know
> > to talk to in the future about it.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Sorry, it should be "GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note".
> Should I correct it and submit a new patch set (v10) now, or wait for more feedback on the current patch set?

Please consult your corporate lawyers when picking licenses for your
kernel files.  I doubt they want me telling you what to do :)

good luck!

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ