linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] soc: litex: Properly depend on HAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABVgOSkkRt5eZRrb8ia-0++0W8A4radZBWWry1P16=ZcAKLAuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:49:56 +0800
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc:     Pawel Czarnecki <pczarnecki@...ernships.antmicro.com>,
        Mateusz Holenko <mholenko@...micro.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: litex: Properly depend on HAS_IOMEM

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 8:27 PM Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 07:36:04PM -0800, David Gow wrote:
> > The LiteX SOC controller driver makes use of IOMEM functions like
> > devm_platform_ioremap_resource(), which are only available if
> > CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM is defined.
> >
> > This causes the driver not to be enable under make ARCH=um allyesconfig,
> > even though it won't build.
>
> Is this wording correct?  I suspect it causes to driver TO BE enabled.
>

Whoops! Yes: that should be "causes the driver to be enabled" -- sorry
about that.

Let me know if you want me to re-send it with the fixed wording, or if
you just want to fix that yourself.

> >
> > By adding a dependency on HAS_IOMEM, the driver will not be enabled on
> > architectures which don't support it.
> >
> > Fixes: 22447a99c97e ("drivers/soc/litex: add LiteX SoC Controller driver")
> > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>a
>
> This looks ok to me.  I can queue it for 5.11 fixes, if you can help with the
> wording above.

Thanks: that'd be great!

Cheers,
-- David

>
> -Stafford
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/soc/litex/Kconfig | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/litex/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/litex/Kconfig
> > index 7c6b009b6f6c..7a7c38282e11 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/litex/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/litex/Kconfig
> > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ config LITEX
> >  config LITEX_SOC_CONTROLLER
> >       tristate "Enable LiteX SoC Controller driver"
> >       depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
> > +     depends on HAS_IOMEM
> >       select LITEX
> >       help
> >         This option enables the SoC Controller Driver which verifies
> > --
> > 2.30.0.280.ga3ce27912f-goog
> >