[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKgGOAe-ZSw9qJ7POVv5nJuX+UoJE-MS3drKrM119pw-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:09:25 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of/device: Update dma_range_map only when dev has
valid dma-ranges
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 7:13 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
>
> [ + Christoph, Marek ]
>
> On 2021-01-27 13:00, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue 19 Jan 21, 18:52, Yong Wu wrote:
> >> The commit e0d072782c73 ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map,
> >> supplanting dma_pfn_offset") always update dma_range_map even though it was
> >> already set, like in the sunxi_mbus driver. the issue is reported at [1].
> >> This patch avoid this(Updating it only when dev has valid dma-ranges).
> >>
> >> Meanwhile, dma_range_map contains the devices' dma_ranges information,
> >> This patch moves dma_range_map before of_iommu_configure. The iommu
> >> driver may need to know the dma_address requirements of its iommu
> >> consumer devices.
> >
> > Just a gentle ping on this issue, it would be nice to have this fix merged
> > ASAP, in the next RC :)
>
> Ack to that - Rob, Frank, do you want to take this through the OF tree,
> or shall we take it through the DMA-mapping tree like the original culprit?
I've already got some fixes queued up and can take it.
Suggested-by doesn't mean you are happy with the implementation. So
Acked-by or Reviewed-by?
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists