[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210127222241.GC848@willie-the-truck>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:22:42 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Alexander A Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: mcs_spinlock: Drop smp_wmb in
arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended()
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 09:01:09PM +0100, Alexander A Sverdlin wrote:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
>
> Drop smp_wmb in arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended() after adding in into
> ARCH-independent code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> index 529d2cf..d8fa921 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
> /* MCS spin-locking. */
> #define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(lock) \
> do { \
> - /* Ensure prior stores are observed before we enter wfe. */ \
> - smp_mb(); \
I think this is the right place for the barrier, not in the core code.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists