[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d05b4ae-e14d-794e-f2bb-0906cbfc2ba1@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:27:21 -0800
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] hugetlb: convert page_huge_active()
HPageMigratable flag
On 1/27/21 2:25 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 22-01-21 11:52:28, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> Use the new hugetlb page specific flag HPageMigratable to replace the
>> page_huge_active interfaces. By it's name, page_huge_active implied
>> that a huge page was on the active list. However, that is not really
>> what code checking the flag wanted to know. It really wanted to determine
>> if the huge page could be migrated. This happens when the page is actually
>> added to the page cache and/or task page table. This is the reasoning
>> behind the name change.
>
> yeah, definitely less confusing!
>
>> The VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() calls in the *_huge_active() interfaces are not
>> really necessary as we KNOW the page is a hugetlb page. Therefore, they
>> are removed.
>>
>> The routine page_huge_active checked for PageHeadHuge before testing the
>> active bit. This is unnecessary in the case where we hold a reference or
>> lock and know it is a hugetlb head page. page_huge_active is also called
>> without holding a reference or lock (scan_movable_pages), and can race with
>> code freeing the page. The extra check in page_huge_active shortened the
>> race window, but did not prevent the race. Offline code calling
>> scan_movable_pages already deals with these races, so removing the check
>> is acceptable. Add comment to racy code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
>> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>
> One nit below
> [...]
>> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> index a7eb05315c6e..58be44a915d1 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> @@ -480,9 +480,13 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
>> * HPG_restore_reserve - Set when a hugetlb page consumes a reservation at
>> * allocation time. Cleared when page is fully instantiated. Free
>> * routine checks flag to restore a reservation on error paths.
>> + * HPG_migratable - Set after a newly allocated page is added to the page
>> + * cache and/or page tables. Indicates the page is a candidate for
>> + * migration.
>
> The state change is synchronized by hugetlb_lock.
>
> Pls.
I will update/explain this. But ... hugetlb_lock does not synchronize all
changes of this flag. The flag is set without holding the lock for newly
allocated pages after being added to page cache and/or page tables. This
'signals' the page is a candidate for migration. When the migration code
(isolation, putback, move state) deals with the flag, it does hold the
hugetlb_lock.
This patch did not change any of the synchronization.
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists