linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] audit: Make audit_filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210127025144.24253-1-yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:51:43 -0800
From:   menglong8.dong@...il.com
To:     paul@...l-moore.com
Cc:     eparis@...hat.com, linux-audit@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com.cn>,
        Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] audit: Make audit_filter_syscall() return void

From: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com.cn>

No invoker uses the return value of audit_filter_syscall().
So make it return void, and amend the comment of
audit_filter_syscall().

Changes since v1:
- amend the comment of audit_filter_syscall().

Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/auditsc.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index ce8c9e2279ba..434337ab6b2b 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -799,12 +799,12 @@ static int audit_in_mask(const struct audit_krule *rule, unsigned long val)
 	return rule->mask[word] & bit;
 }
 
-/* At syscall entry and exit time, this filter is called if the
- * audit_state is not low enough that auditing cannot take place, but is
- * also not high enough that we already know we have to write an audit
- * record (i.e., the state is AUDIT_SETUP_CONTEXT or AUDIT_BUILD_CONTEXT).
+/* At syscall exit time, this filter is called if the audit_state is
+ * not low enough that auditing cannot take place, but is also not
+ * high enough that we already know we have to write an audit record
+ * (i.e., the state is AUDIT_SETUP_CONTEXT or AUDIT_BUILD_CONTEXT).
  */
-static enum audit_state audit_filter_syscall(struct task_struct *tsk,
+static void audit_filter_syscall(struct task_struct *tsk,
 					     struct audit_context *ctx,
 					     struct list_head *list)
 {
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ static enum audit_state audit_filter_syscall(struct task_struct *tsk,
 	enum audit_state state;
 
 	if (auditd_test_task(tsk))
-		return AUDIT_DISABLED;
+		return;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, list, list) {
@@ -821,11 +821,11 @@ static enum audit_state audit_filter_syscall(struct task_struct *tsk,
 				       &state, false)) {
 			rcu_read_unlock();
 			ctx->current_state = state;
-			return state;
+			return;
 		}
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-	return AUDIT_BUILD_CONTEXT;
+	return;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.25.1