[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e38051e-b341-66b9-5e2e-2c3f26d3ff70@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:00:07 +0800
From: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/7] KVM: MMU: Add support for PKS emulation
On 1/27/2021 2:23 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/08/20 10:48, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
>>
>> if (pte_access & PT_USER_MASK)
>> pkr_bits = (vcpu->arch.pkru >> (pte_pkey * 2)) & 3;
>> + else if (!kvm_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PKRS, &pkrs))
>> + pkr_bits = (pkrs >> (pte_pkey * 2)) & 3;
>
> You should be able to always use vcpu->arch.pkrs here. So
>
> pkr = pte_access & PT_USER_MASK ? vcpu->arch.pkru : vcpu->arch.pkrs;
> pkr_bits = (pkr >> pte_pkey * 2) & 3;
>
> Paolo
Concerning vcpu->arch.pkrs would be the only use case in current
submitted patches, is it still necessary to shadow it?
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists