lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:00:07 +0800
From:   Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/7] KVM: MMU: Add support for PKS emulation



On 1/27/2021 2:23 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/08/20 10:48, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
>>
>>          if (pte_access & PT_USER_MASK)
>>              pkr_bits = (vcpu->arch.pkru >> (pte_pkey * 2)) & 3;
>> +        else if (!kvm_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PKRS, &pkrs))
>> +            pkr_bits = (pkrs >> (pte_pkey * 2)) & 3;
> 
> You should be able to always use vcpu->arch.pkrs here.  So
> 
> pkr = pte_access & PT_USER_MASK ? vcpu->arch.pkru : vcpu->arch.pkrs;
> pkr_bits = (pkr >> pte_pkey * 2) & 3;
> 
> Paolo

Concerning vcpu->arch.pkrs would be the only use case in current 
submitted patches, is it still necessary to shadow it?

> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ