lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210126202058.GC12469@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 21:20:59 +0100
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@....com>, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tracing: precise log info for kretprobe addr err

On 01/26, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > >
> > > IOW, the "offset != 0" check removed by this patch is obviously wrong, right?
> > >
>
> No, not wrong. Even offset != 0, if the symbol exists in the kernel,
> kprobe_on_func_entry() will check it.

Yes, but unless I am totally confused... if kprobe_on_func_entry() returns false,
then trace_kprobe_create() should fail with BAD_RETPROBE even if offset == 0 ?

Oleg.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ