linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/2] arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42e9d8cc-ea8a-7a95-c3d4-232cd362547b@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:16:42 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, ardb@...nel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory



On 1/25/21 1:01 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:52:32AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>> On 12/22/20 12:42 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> pfn_valid() asserts that there is a memblock entry for a given pfn without
>>> MEMBLOCK_NOMAP flag being set. The problem with ZONE_DEVICE based memory is
>>> that they do not have memblock entries. Hence memblock_is_map_memory() will
>>> invariably fail via memblock_search() for a ZONE_DEVICE based address. This
>>> eventually fails pfn_valid() which is wrong. memblock_is_map_memory() needs
>>> to be skipped for such memory ranges. As ZONE_DEVICE memory gets hotplugged
>>> into the system via memremap_pages() called from a driver, their respective
>>> memory sections will not have SECTION_IS_EARLY set.
>>>
>>> Normal hotplug memory will never have MEMBLOCK_NOMAP set in their memblock
>>> regions. Because the flag MEMBLOCK_NOMAP was specifically designed and set
>>> for firmware reserved memory regions. memblock_is_map_memory() can just be
>>> skipped as its always going to be positive and that will be an optimization
>>> for the normal hotplug memory. Like ZONE_DEVIE based memory, all hotplugged
>>> normal memory too will not have SECTION_IS_EARLY set for their sections.
>>>
>>> Skipping memblock_is_map_memory() for all non early memory sections would
>>> fix pfn_valid() problem for ZONE_DEVICE based memory and also improve its
>>> performance for normal hotplug memory as well.
>>>
>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>> Fixes: 73b20c84d42d ("arm64: mm: implement pte_devmap support")
>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
>>
>> Hello David/Mike,
>>
>> Given that we would need to rework early sections, memblock semantics via a
>> new config i.e EARLY_SECTION_MEMMAP_HOLES and also some possible changes to
>> ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK and HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID, wondering if these patches here
>> which fixes a problem (and improves performance) can be merged first. After
>> that, I could start working on the proposed rework. Could you please let me
>> know your thoughts on this. Thank you.
> 
> I didn't object to these patches, I think they are fine.
> I agree that we can look into update of arm64's pfn_valid(), maybe right
> after decrease of section size lands in.

Sure, will drop the RFC tag and prepare these patches.