[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d8dfb9e4-1823-cc79-3d8c-18240fdd0567@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:08:22 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Fix use after free when subpool max_hpages
accounting is not enabled
On 2021/1/27 8:06, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 1/26/21 3:55 AM, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> When subpool max_hpages accounting is not enabled, used_hpages is always 0
>> and might lead to release subpool prematurely because it indicates no pages
>> are used now while there might be.
>
> It might be good to say that you need min_hpages accounting (min_size mount
> option) enabled for this issue to occur. Or, perhaps say this is possible
> if a hugetlbfs filesystem is created with the min_size option and without
> the size option.
>
> That might better explain the conditions in which a user could see the issue.
So commit log might looks like this ?
"""
If a hugetlbfs filesystem is created with the min_size option and without
the size option, used_hpages is always 0 and might lead to release subpool
prematurely because it indicates no pages are used now while there might
be.
In order to fix this issue, we should check used_hpages == 0 iff max_hpages
accounting is enabled. As max_hpages accounting should be enabled in most
common case, this is not worth a Cc stable.
"""
If so, should I send a V2 or Andrew would kindly do this?
Many thanks.
>
>> In order to fix this issue, we should check used_hpages == 0 iff max_hpages
>> accounting is enabled. As max_hpages accounting should be enabled in most
>> common case, this is not worth a Cc stable.
>
> I agree that such a combination of mount options is very uncommon.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongxiang Lou <louhongxiang@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> mm/hugetlb.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
>
Many thanks for review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists