[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32f4752f-6954-183a-a0c1-b5d719c85b67@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:36:08 +0800
From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@...wei.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
CC: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
"Jean-Philippe Brucker" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Yang Yingliang" <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
iommu <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: add support for BBML
On 2021/1/27 10:01, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/1/26 18:12, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:23:40PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> Now we probably will need some degreee of BBML feature awareness for the
>>> sake of SVA if and when we start using it for CPU pagetables, but I still
>>> cannot see any need to consider it in io-pgtable.
>>
>> Agreed; I don't think this is something that io-pgtable should have to care
>> about.
Hi,
I have a question here :-).
If the old table is not live, then the break procedure seems unnecessary. Do I miss something?
Thanks,
Keqian
>
> Yes, the SVA works in stall mode, and the failed device access requests are not
> discarded.
>
> Let me look for examples. The BBML usage scenario was told by a former colleague.
>
>>
>> Will
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists