[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed72302d-2644-75d4-f219-7855cf0430df@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:37:12 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@...el.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/7] KVM: MMU: Add support for PKS emulation
On 27/01/21 04:00, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> if (pte_access & PT_USER_MASK)
>>> pkr_bits = (vcpu->arch.pkru >> (pte_pkey * 2)) & 3;
>>> + else if (!kvm_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PKRS, &pkrs))
>>> + pkr_bits = (pkrs >> (pte_pkey * 2)) & 3;
>>
>> You should be able to always use vcpu->arch.pkrs here. So
>>
>> pkr = pte_access & PT_USER_MASK ? vcpu->arch.pkru : vcpu->arch.pkrs;
>> pkr_bits = (pkr >> pte_pkey * 2) & 3;
>>
> Concerning vcpu->arch.pkrs would be the only use case in current
> submitted patches, is it still necessary to shadow it?
Yes, please do. kvm_get_msr is pretty slow, and the code becomes
simpler too.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists