[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YBChUOc1iKZv8TJ1@google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:10:08 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix unsynchronized access to sev members through
svm_register_enc_region
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 1/26/21 12:54 PM, Peter Gonda wrote:
> > sev_pin_memory assumes that callers hold the kvm->lock. This was true for
> > all callers except svm_register_enc_region since it does not originate
> > from svm_mem_enc_op. Also added lockdep annotation to help prevent
> > future regressions.
>
> I'm not exactly sure what the problem is that your fixing? What is the
> symptom that you're seeing?
svm_register_enc_region() calls sev_pin_memory() without holding kvm->lock. If
userspace does multiple KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_REG_REGION in parallel, it could
circumvent the rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) check.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists