linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 12/17] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:50:31 +0100
From:   Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        "ohad@...ery.com" <ohad@...ery.com>,
        "bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/17] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_detach()



On 12/18/20 6:32 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Introduce function rproc_detach() to enable the remoteproc
> core to release the resources associated with a remote processor
> without stopping its operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  2 +
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index e665ed4776c3..ece3f15070b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed)
>  /*
>   * __rproc_detach(): Does the opposite of rproc_attach()
>   */
> -static int __maybe_unused __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
> +static int __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -1927,6 +1927,75 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown);
>  
> +/**
> + * rproc_detach() - Detach the remote processor from the
> + * remoteproc core
> + *
> + * @rproc: the remote processor
> + *
> + * Detach a remote processor (previously attached to with rproc_actuate()).

You rename the function to rproc_attach in you patch 04/17.

Then Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>

Thanks,
Arnaud

> + *
> + * In case @rproc is still being used by an additional user(s), then
> + * this function will just decrement the power refcount and exit,
> + * without disconnecting the device.
> + *
> + * Function rproc_detach() calls __rproc_detach() in order to let a remote
> + * processor know that services provided by the application processor are
> + * no longer available.  From there it should be possible to remove the
> + * platform driver and even power cycle the application processor (if the HW
> + * supports it) without needing to switch off the remote processor.
> + */
> +int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING && rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED) {
> +		ret = -EPERM;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* if the remote proc is still needed, bail out */
> +	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power)) {
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = __rproc_detach(rproc);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* clean up all acquired resources */
> +	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
> +
> +	rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the remote processor was booted by the core the cached table needs
> +	 * to be freed and ->table_ptr set to NULL because it will be
> +	 * invalidated by rproc_resource_cleanup().  If the remote processor was
> +	 * attached to ->cached_table is NULL and kfree() returns right away.
> +	 *
> +	 * In either case ->table_ptr has to be set to NULL.  It will be set
> +	 * again when the remote processor is re-attached to.
> +	 */
> +	kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> +	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> +	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_detach);
> +
>  /**
>   * rproc_get_by_phandle() - find a remote processor by phandle
>   * @phandle: phandle to the rproc
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 9bb34c3eb847..65ece6f177b7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -659,6 +659,8 @@ rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len,
>  
>  int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc);
>  void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc);
> +int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc);
> +int rproc_set_firmware(struct rproc *rproc, const char *fw_name);
>  void rproc_report_crash(struct rproc *rproc, enum rproc_crash_type type);
>  int rproc_coredump_add_segment(struct rproc *rproc, dma_addr_t da, size_t size);
>  int rproc_coredump_add_custom_segment(struct rproc *rproc,
>