linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210127091540.xesvwoeavyaf37jn@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:45:40 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        vireshk@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
        Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, amitk@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        cw00.choi@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
        kyungmin.park@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] New thermal interface allowing IPA to get max
 power

On 26-01-21, 10:39, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> As it's a RFC, it still misses the cpufreq sysfs implementation, but would
> be addressed if all agree.

Not commenting on the whole stuff but if you ever need something for cpufreq, it
is already there. Look for these.

store_one(scaling_min_freq, min);
store_one(scaling_max_freq, max);

Hopefully they will work just fine.

-- 
viresh