linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use DEFINE_RES

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <266dcbb7-56fb-6b29-6e50-d49fbee5a966@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:35:59 +0800
From:   "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        iommu <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use DEFINE_RES_MEM() to simplify
 code



On 2021/1/27 17:23, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:05:50AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>> I've sent another set of patches. https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/26/1065
>> If those patches are acceptable, then this one should be ignored.
> 
> I've already queued this one, so if you want me to drop it then you need to
> send me a revert.

Thanks. Since it's queued, keep it. I'll update the new patch set.

> 
> Will
> 
> .
>