[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210127104617.1173-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:46:08 +0300
From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] gpio: ep93xx: fixes series patch
Series of patches to fix ep93xx gpio driver to make IRQ's working.
The following are fix patches (these are enough to get gpio-ep93xx
working with modern kernel):
[PATCH v2 1/9] gpio: ep93xx: fix BUG_ON port F usage
[PATCH v2 2/9] gpio: ep93xx: Fix single irqchip with multi
gpiochips
[PATCH v2 3/9] gpio: ep93xx: Fix wrong irq numbers in port F
The following are cleanup and style patches:
[PATCH v2 4/9] gpio: ep93xx: drop to_irq binding
[PATCH v2 5/9] gpio: ep93xx: Fix typo s/hierarchial/hierarchical
[PATCH v2 6/9] gpio: ep93xx: refactor ep93xx_gpio_add_bank
[PATCH v2 7/9] gpio: ep93xx: separate IRQ's setup
[PATCH v2 8/9] gpio: ep93xx: refactor base IRQ number
[PATCH v2 9/9] gpio: ep93xx: replace bools with idx for IRQ ports
The futher work can be done by removing ep93xx_gpio_port function
and, maybe, ep93xx_gpio_update_int_params. But i think it's better
to be done in conjunction with converting ep93xx to DT support.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists