[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YBBXcdLbj92yMJhw@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:54:57 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Mayulong <mayulong1@...wei.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/21] Move Hisilicon 6421v600 SPMI driver set out of
staging
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:18:02AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Mark/Lee,
>
> This patch series finish addressing support for Hikey 970
> SPMI controller, PMIC and regulators.
>
> This version was generated with -M, in order to make easier
> to merge upstream. Also, rebased on the top of v5.10,
> without any dependencies from the other patch series
> I'm submitting for this board.
>
> Yet, patch 18 to 20 modifies drivers/staging/hikey9xx/Kconfig
> and drivers/staging/hikey9xx/Makefile. So, trivial conflicts
> will rise if they're applied via different trees, as they all
> remove some lines from such files.
I've applied the first 13 patches, except for patch 3, as that did not
apply, to my tree, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists