linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] sunxi: Support IRQ wakeup from deep sleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:57:52 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Ondrej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] sunxi: Support IRQ wakeup from deep sleep

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 6:56 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 12:26:26AM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > On 1/22/21 4:47 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 07:33:54PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > >> On 1/21/21 2:35 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > >>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 23:50:30 -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > >>>> Allwinner sun6i/sun8i/sun50i SoCs (A31 and newer) have two interrupt
> > >>>> controllers: GIC and R_INTC. GIC does not support wakeup. R_INTC handles
> > >>>> the external NMI pin, and provides 32+ IRQs to the ARISC. The first 16
> > >>>> of these correspond 1:1 to a block of GIC IRQs starting with the NMI.
> > >>>> The last 13-16 multiplex the first (up to) 128 GIC SPIs.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This series replaces the existing chained irqchip driver that could only
> > >>>> control the NMI, with a stacked irqchip driver that also provides wakeup
> > >>>> capability for those multiplexed SPI IRQs. The idea is to preconfigure
> > >>>> the ARISC's IRQ controller, and then the ARISC firmware knows to wake up
> > >>>> as soon as it receives an IRQ. It can also decide how deep it can
> > >>>> suspend based on the enabled wakeup IRQs.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [...]
> > >>>
> > >>> Applied to irq/irqchip-5.12, thanks!
> > >>>
> > >>> [01/10] dt-bindings: irq: sun6i-r: Split the binding from sun7i-nmi
> > >>>         commit: ad6b47cdef760410311f41876b21eb0c6fda4717
> > >>> [02/10] dt-bindings: irq: sun6i-r: Add a compatible for the H3
> > >>>         commit: 6436eb4417094ea3308b33d8392fc02a1068dc78
> > >>> [03/10] irqchip/sun6i-r: Use a stacked irqchip driver
> > >>>         commit: 4e34614636b31747b190488240a95647c227021f
> > >>> [04/10] irqchip/sun6i-r: Add wakeup support
> > >>>         commit: 7ab365f6cd6de1e2b0cb1e1e3873dbf68e6f1003
> > >>>
> > >>> Please route the dts patches via the soc tree. Also, I had to
> > >>> manually fix the first patch as it wouldn't apply on top of
> > >>> 5.11-rc4 (which tree has it been diffed against?). Please
> > >>> check that the resolution is correct.
> > >>
> > >> This series was based on sunxi/for-next, which contains commit
> > >> 752b0aac99c7 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun7i-nmi: Add binding documentation
> > >> for the V3s NMI")[1].
> > >
> > > I assume merging the DT bits alone would break things? If so, I guess we
> > > can wait for 5.12 to be released before merging it
> >
> > Patch 5 does not depend on the new driver, so it could be merged at any
> > time. Yes, the remaining patches would break things if merged without
> > the driver.
>
> I've applied patch 5 then, could you send the rest of the DT patches
> when 5.13-rc1 is out?

I've put them in a for-5.13-late branch and merged them into for-next.
This should get a bit of boot testing via KernelCI. Maybe we'll get to
sending a late pull request for 5.13, maybe not.

ChenYu