lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:50:42 -0500
From:   Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:     Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] nfsd: fix check of statid returned from call to
 find_stateid_by_type

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 03:53:36PM +0000, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > On Jan 28, 2021, at 10:34 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> > Fixes tags are used for a lot of different things:
> > 1)  If there is a fixes tag, then you can tell it does *NOT* have to
> >    be back ported because the original commit is not in the stable
> >    tree.  It saves time for the stable maintainers.
> > 2)  Metrics to figure out how quickly we are fixing bugs.
> > 3)  Sometimes the Fixes tag helps because we want to review the original
> >    patch to see what the intent was.
> > 
> > All sorts of stuff.  Etc.
> 
> Yep, I'm a fan of all that. I just want to avoid poking the stable
> automation bear when it's unnecessary.

I've routinely had patches with Fixes: lines referencing other queued-up
patches, and I didn't get any stable mail about it.

100% not something to worry about.

--b.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ