[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12187293-e972-acd8-7789-22ebfa736f95@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 14:00:29 -0800
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] hugetlb: only set HPageMigratable for migratable
hstates
On 1/28/21 1:37 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 06:52:21 +0100 Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 03:36:41PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>> Yes, this patch is somewhat optional. It should be a minor improvement
>>> in cases where we are dealing with hpages in a non-migratable hstate.
>>> Although, I do not believe this is the common case.
>>>
>>> The real reason for even looking into this was a comment by Oscar. With
>>> the name change to HPageMigratable, it implies that the page is migratable.
>>> However, this is not the case if the page's hstate does not support migration.
>>> So, if we check the hstate when setting the flag we can eliminate those
>>> cases where the page is certainly not migratable.
>>>
>>> I don't really love this patch. It has minimal functional value.
>>>
>>> Oscar, what do you think about dropping this?
>>
>> Yeah, I remember this topic arose during a discussion of patch#2 in the
>> early versions, about whether the renaming to HPageMigratable made
>> sense.
>>
>> Back then I thought that we could have this in one place at fault-path [1],
>> which should have made this prettier, but it is not the case.
>> True is that the optimization is little, so I am fine with dropping this
>> patch.
>
> I've dropped it.
Thanks Andrew.
Michal suggested that comments describing synchronization be added for each
flag. Since I did 'one patch per flag', that would be an update to each patch.
Or, I could simply add a patch to update the comment block based on what you
already have.
Let me know what is best/easiest for you.
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists