[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210128223020.GG186627@wantstofly.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:30:20 +0200
From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_GETDENTS64
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 04:33:34PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> IORING_OP_GETDENTS64 behaves like getdents64(2) and takes the same
> >
> > Could we drop the '64'? We don't, for example, have IOURING_OP_FADVISE64
> > even though that's the name of the syscall.
>
> Agreed, only case we do mimic the names are for things like
> IORING_OP_OPENAT2 where it does carry meaning. For this one, it should
> just be IORING_OP_GETDENTS.
OK, I've made this change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists