[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210128154537.2ed50d06@lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:45:37 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Eric Curtin <ericcurtin17@...il.com>
Cc: "Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@...klimov.de>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org (open list:DOCUMENTATION),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:26:47 +0000
Eric Curtin <ericcurtin17@...il.com> wrote:
> max_user_watches for epoll should say 1/25, rather than 1/32
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Curtin <ericcurtin17@...il.com>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst
> index f48277a0a850..2a501c9ddc55 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst
> @@ -380,5 +380,5 @@ This configuration option sets the maximum number of "watches" that are
> allowed for each user.
> Each "watch" costs roughly 90 bytes on a 32bit kernel, and roughly 160 bytes
> on a 64bit one.
> -The current default value for max_user_watches is the 1/32 of the available
> -low memory, divided for the "watch" cost in bytes.
> +The current default value for max_user_watches is the 1/25 (4%) of the
> +available low memory, divided for the "watch" cost in bytes.
That does appear to be the way of it...patch applied, thanks.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists