[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJMQK-gHjmm-BaG83EXMOkT6KeCyJJN4ZqRDdT75BcED53bREw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 14:15:47 +0800
From: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
To: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 8/9] drm/mediatek: add DDP support for MT8183
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:13 PM CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Hsin-Yi:
>
> Modify the title's prefix to 'soc: mediatek:'
>
> On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 12:54 +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> >
> > Add DDP support for MT8183 SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > index f531b119da7a9..f64e9c33e85ad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
> >
> > #define MT2701_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x2c
> > #define MT2701_MUTEX0_SOF0 0x30
> > +#define MT8183_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x30
> > +#define MT8183_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF0 0x2c
>
> Modify 'DISP_MUTEX' to 'MUTEX'
>
> >
> > #define DISP_REG_MUTEX_EN(n) (0x20 + 0x20 * (n))
> > #define DISP_REG_MUTEX(n) (0x24 + 0x20 * (n))
> > @@ -37,6 +39,18 @@
> > #define MT8167_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER 15
> > #define MT8167_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_UFOE 16
> >
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA0 0
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA1 1
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0 9
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0_2L 10
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL1_2L 11
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_WDMA0 12
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_COLOR0 13
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_CCORR0 14
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_AAL0 15
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_GAMMA0 16
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER0 17
> > +
> > #define MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0 11
> > #define MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL1 12
> > #define MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA0 13
> > @@ -87,6 +101,12 @@
> > #define MT2712_MUTEX_SOF_DSI3 6
> > #define MT8167_MUTEX_SOF_DPI0 2
> > #define MT8167_MUTEX_SOF_DPI1 3
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DSI0 1
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DPI0 2
> > +
> > +/* Add EOF setting so overlay hardware can receive frame done irq */
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DSI0 (MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DSI0 << 6)
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DPI0 (MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DPI0 << 6)
> >
Hi CK, comment is added here. I can move to mt8183_mutex_sof if preferred.
> > struct mtk_mutex {
> > int id;
> > @@ -181,6 +201,20 @@ static const unsigned int mt8173_mutex_mod[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> > [DDP_COMPONENT_WDMA1] = MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_WDMA1,
> > };
> >
> > +static const unsigned int mt8183_mutex_mod[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_AAL0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_AAL0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_CCORR0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_COLOR0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_GAMMA] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_GAMMA0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_OVL0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_2L0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0_2L,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_2L1] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL1_2L,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA1] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA1,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_WDMA0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_WDMA0,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const unsigned int mt2712_mutex_sof[MUTEX_SOF_DSI3 + 1] = {
> > [MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE] = MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE,
> > [MUTEX_SOF_DSI0] = MUTEX_SOF_DSI0,
> > @@ -198,6 +232,12 @@ static const unsigned int mt8167_mutex_sof[MUTEX_SOF_DSI3 + 1] = {
> > [MUTEX_SOF_DPI1] = MT8167_MUTEX_SOF_DPI1,
> > };
> >
> > +static const unsigned int mt8183_mutex_sof[MUTEX_SOF_DSI3 + 1] = {
> > + [MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE] = MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE,
> > + [MUTEX_SOF_DSI0] = MUTEX_SOF_DSI0 | MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DSI0,
> > + [MUTEX_SOF_DPI0] = MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DPI0 | MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DPI0,
>
> According to discussion in [1], add comment for the odd EOF setting.
>
> [1]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/1595469798-3824-8-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com/
>
> Regards,
> CK.
>
>
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct mtk_mutex_data mt2701_mutex_driver_data = {
> > .mutex_mod = mt2701_mutex_mod,
> > .mutex_sof = mt2712_mutex_sof,
> > @@ -227,6 +267,14 @@ static const struct mtk_mutex_data mt8173_mutex_driver_data = {
> > .mutex_sof_reg = MT2701_MUTEX0_SOF0,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_mutex_data mt8183_mutex_driver_data = {
> > + .mutex_mod = mt8183_mutex_mod,
> > + .mutex_sof = mt8183_mutex_sof,
> > + .mutex_mod_reg = MT8183_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0,
> > + .mutex_sof_reg = MT8183_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF0,
> > + .no_clk = true,
> > +};
> > +
> > struct mtk_mutex *mtk_mutex_get(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct mtk_mutex_ctx *mtx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > @@ -457,6 +505,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id mutex_driver_dt_match[] = {
> > .data = &mt8167_mutex_driver_data},
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex",
> > .data = &mt8173_mutex_driver_data},
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-disp-mutex",
> > + .data = &mt8183_mutex_driver_data},
> > {},
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mutex_driver_dt_match);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists