linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv1] firmware: stratix10-svc: reset COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YBJvNL8MhtrFi6gL@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:00:52 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     richard.gong@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     mdf@...nel.org, trix@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Richard Gong <richard.gong@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1] firmware: stratix10-svc: reset
 COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL to 0

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 03:43:21PM -0600, richard.gong@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Richard Gong <richard.gong@...el.com>
> 
> Clean up COMMAND_RECONFIG_FLAG_PARTIAL flag by resetting it to 0, which
> aligns with the firmware settings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Gong <richard.gong@...el.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/firmware/intel/stratix10-svc-client.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>