[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY2XYi2jqYiXaBUfRO1+UEK3QCC8JQ0duENVGoOfYTmBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:17:23 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>,
Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: counter: add pulse-counter binding
Hi Oleksij,
thanks for your patch!
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 2:15 PM Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> Add binding for the pulse counter node
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
(...)
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: virtual,pulse-counter
What is so virtual about this? The device seems very real.
However it is certainly a GPIO counter.
I would call it "gpio-counter" simply.
Define:
$nodename:
pattern: "^counter(@.*)?$"
> + counter-0 {
counter@0 {
> + counter-1 {
counter@1 {
Thanks!
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists