[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YBJ2CjN2YntC1o3j@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:30:02 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
lkp@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [printk] b031a684bf: INFO:rcu_tasks_detected_stalls_on_tasks
On (21/01/27 22:28), John Ogness wrote:
>
> # modprobe rcutorture onoff_interval=3 onoff_holdoff=30 torture_type=tasks
>
> (Those are the same modprobe parameters used by the lkp job.)
>
> After about a minute I see:
>
> [ 47.268292] tasks-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: Start of episode
> [ 51.273365] tasks-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: End of episode
> [ 55.823306] smpboot: do_boot_cpu failed(-1) to wakeup CPU#0
> [ 55.824350] tasks-torture:torture_onoff task: online 0 failed: errno -5
> [ 55.830661] tasks-torture:torture_onoff task: online 0 failed: errno -5
> [ 55.848524] tasks-torture:torture_onoff task: online 0 failed: errno -5
Just out of curious, this is seen only with the printk commit in
question applied? do_boot_cpu() doesn't seem to call a lot of printk-s,
only pr_debug("Setting warm reset code and vector.\n"), as far as I can
tell.
I can't repro this on my arm64 board. Maybe it's too slow. Race condition?
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists