[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <304bd6db-4c67-a4bd-3b79-74c0474edefa@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:43:05 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix CPUID entries returned by KVM_GET_CPUID2
ioctl
On 28/01/21 09:36, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> This is embarrassing but I have a (possible) excuse: copy_to_user's
> argument is 'void *' so no warning was produced. Surprisingly, no test
> caught the breakage. Thanks for debugging and fixing!
So who writes the test:
- the author of the buggy patch
- the maintainer who failed to spot it
- the poor sod who fixed the issue
?
(Just kidding, it will of course be either me or a fourth person :)).
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists