[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210128105501.GC3324@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:55:01 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: bingjingc <bingjingc@...ology.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.com, jack@...e.cz,
axboe@...nel.dk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cccheng@...ology.com,
robbieko@...ology.com, willy@...radead.org, rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] handle large user and group ID for isofs and udf
On Thu 28-01-21 15:12:27, bingjingc wrote:
> From: BingJing Chang <bingjingc@...ology.com>
>
> The uid/gid (unsigned int) of a domain user may be larger than INT_MAX.
> The parse_options of isofs and udf will return 0, and mount will fail
> with -EINVAL. These patches try to handle large user and group ID.
>
> BingJing Chang (3):
> parser: add unsigned int parser
> isofs: handle large user and group ID
> udf: handle large user and group ID
Thanks for your patches! Just two notes:
1) I don't think Matthew Wilcox gave you his Reviewed-by tag (at least I
didn't see such email). Generally the rule is that the developer has to
explicitely write in his email that you can attach his Reviewed-by tag for
it to be valid.
2) Please split the cleanup of kernel doc comments in lib/parser.c in a
separate patch. It is unrelated to adding parse_uint() function so it
belongs into a separate patch (we occasionally do include small unrelated
cleanups if they are on the same line we change anyway but your changes
definitely triggered my treshold of this should be a separate patch).
Thanks!
Honza
>
> fs/isofs/inode.c | 9 +++++----
> fs/udf/super.c | 9 +++++----
> include/linux/parser.h | 1 +
> lib/parser.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists