linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 05/20] Input: axp20x-pek: Bail out if AXP has no interrupt line connected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:36:01 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>,
        Shuosheng Huang <huangshuosheng@...winnertech.com>,
        Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/20] Input: axp20x-pek: Bail out if AXP has no
 interrupt line connected

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:11:28AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:24:45PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:

> > > Check for the regmap_irqc member to be not NULL before proceeding with
> > > probe. This gets normally filled by the call to regmap_add_irq_chip(),
> > > which we allow to skip now, when the DT node lacks an interrupt
> > > property.  

It sounds like you're trying to register an IRQ chip with a somehow
bogus configuration?

> > No, the driver is not the right place to patch this; regmap should be
> > fixed so it does not crash instead.

> I am not sure this is the right approach, those regmap functions look
> more like an internal interface to me, with lots of wrapper functions
> happily dereferencing pointers and reaching into structs. Moving
> NULL checks into those does not sound like the right thing. CC:ing Mark
> for more opinions on this.

Without having seen the actual issue if you're trying to register an
interrupt controller with a known broken hardware configuration that
does seem like something the caller just shouldn't be doing, it's not
something that's going to transiently happen at runtime and we're very
much trusting that the caller got things right.

> A more general solution would be to not instantiate this driver here
> at all, when we don't have an interrupt line.
> However at the moment the AXP MFD driver uses a const struct to hold
> all MFD cells, so there is no easy way of omitting the power key
> device dynamically. And even then it would hard code the requirement
> for an interrupt into the MFD driver, when this could be considered an
> implementation detail of the axp20x-pek driver.

Another approach is to just register the optional device separately.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)