linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: am335x-pocketbeagle: unique gpio-line-names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdam4gY3iU1DBtczgdnxQ-t0OkrRMZ-Y9e1W0FQOrYnndw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:01:00 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>
Cc:     Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>,
        Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...gleboard.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: am335x-pocketbeagle: unique gpio-line-names

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 1:04 AM Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org> wrote:

> Based on linux-gpio discussion [1], it is best practice to make the
> gpio-line-names unique. Generic names like "[ethernet]" are replaced
> with the name of the unique signal on the AM3358 SoC ball corresponding
> to the gpio line. "[NC]" is also renamed to the standard "NC" name to
> represent "not connected".
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20201216195357.GA2583366@x1/
>
> Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>

This certainly looks better!
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij