[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ba2c461-6042-757d-a3c1-0490932e749e@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:13:28 +0800
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@....com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, philipp.reisner@...bit.com,
lars.ellenberg@...bit.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
roger.pau@...rix.com, minchan@...nel.org, ngupta@...are.org,
sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com, agk@...hat.com,
snitzer@...hat.com, hch@....de, sagi@...mberg.me,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, tytso@....edu,
jaegeuk@...nel.org, ebiggers@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org,
shaggy@...nel.org, konishi.ryusuke@...il.com, mark@...heh.com,
jlbec@...lplan.org, damien.lemoal@....com, naohiro.aota@....com,
jth@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, len.brown@...el.com,
pavel@....cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hare@...e.de,
gustavoars@...nel.org, tiwai@...e.de, alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com,
asml.silence@...il.com, ming.lei@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org,
osandov@...com, bvanassche@....org, jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 25/34] ocfs/cluster: use bio_new in dm-log-writes
I think you send a wrong subject by mistake.
Thanks,
Joseph
On 1/28/21 3:11 PM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@....com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c b/fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c
> index 0179a73a3fa2..b34518036446 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c
> @@ -515,12 +515,13 @@ static struct bio *o2hb_setup_one_bio(struct o2hb_region *reg,
> unsigned int cs = *current_slot;
> struct bio *bio;
> struct page *page;
> + sector_t sect = (reg->hr_start_block + cs) << (bits - 9);
>
> /* Testing has shown this allocation to take long enough under
> * GFP_KERNEL that the local node can get fenced. It would be
> * nicest if we could pre-allocate these bios and avoid this
> * all together. */
> - bio = bio_alloc(GFP_ATOMIC, 16);
> + bio = bio_new(reg->hr_bdev, sect, op, op_flags, 16, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!bio) {
> mlog(ML_ERROR, "Could not alloc slots BIO!\n");
> bio = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> @@ -528,11 +529,8 @@ static struct bio *o2hb_setup_one_bio(struct o2hb_region *reg,
> }
>
> /* Must put everything in 512 byte sectors for the bio... */
> - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = (reg->hr_start_block + cs) << (bits - 9);
> - bio_set_dev(bio, reg->hr_bdev);
> bio->bi_private = wc;
> bio->bi_end_io = o2hb_bio_end_io;
> - bio_set_op_attrs(bio, op, op_flags);
>
> vec_start = (cs << bits) % PAGE_SIZE;
> while(cs < max_slots) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists