linux-kernel - Re: kprobes broken since 0d00449c7a28 ("x86: Replace ist_enter() with nmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210128103415.d90be51ec607bb6123b2843c@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:34:15 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kprobes broken since 0d00449c7a28
 ("x86: Replace ist_enter() with nmi_enter()")

On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:57:56 +0200
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 27.01.21 г. 17:24 ч., Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:13:53 +0900
> > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Nikolay,
> >>
> >> On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:43:29 +0200
> >> Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I'm currently seeing latest Linus' master being somewhat broken w.r.t
> >>> krpobes. In particular I have the following test-case:
> >>>
> >>> #!/bin/bash
> >>>
> >>> mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdc &> /dev/null
> >>> mount /dev/vdc /media/scratch/
> >>>
> >>> bpftrace -e 'kprobe:btrfs_sync_file {printf("kprobe: %s\n", kstack());}'
> >>> &>bpf-output &
> >>> bpf_trace_pid=$!
> >>>
> >>> # force btrfs_sync_file to be called
> >>> sleep 2
> >>> xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 4m" -c "fsync" /media/scratch/file5
> >>>
> >>> kill $bpf_trace_pid
> >>> sleep 1
> >>>
> >>> grep -q kprobe bpf-output
> >>> retval=$?
> >>> rm -f bpf-output
> >>> umount /media/scratch
> >>>
> >>> exit $retval
> >>>
> >>> It traces btrfs_sync_file which is called when fsync is executed on a
> >>> btrfs file, however I don't see the stacktrace being printed i.e the
> >>> kprobe doesn't fire at all. The following alternative program:
> >>>
> >>> bpftrace -e 'tracepoint:btrfs:btrfs_sync_file {printf("tracepoint:
> >>> %s\n", kstack());} kprobe:btrfs_sync_file {printf("kprobe: %s\n",
> >>> kstack());}'
> >>>
> >>> only prints the stack from the tracepoint and not from the kprobe, given
> >>> that the tracepoint is called from the btrfs_sync_file function.
> >>
> >> Thank you for reporting!
> >>
> >> If you don't mind, could you confirm it with ftrace (tracefs)?
> >> bpftrace etc. involves too many things. It is better to test with
> >> simpler way to test it.
> >> I'm not familer with the bpftrace, but I think you can check it with
> >>
> >> # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
> >> # echo p:myevent btrfs_sync_file >> kprobe_events
> >> # echo stacktrace > events/kprobes/myevent/trigger
> >>  (or echo 1 > options/stacktrace , if trigger file doesn't exist)
> > 
> > Of course, also you have to enable the event.
> >  # echo 1 > events/kprobes/myevent/enable
> > 
> > And check the results
> > 
> >  # cat trace
> > 
> > 
> >> Could you also share your kernel config, so that we can reproduce it?
> > 
> 
> I've attached the config and indeed with the scenario you proposed it
> seems to works. I see:
> 
>        xfs_io-20280   [000] d.Z.  9900.748633: myevent:
> (btrfs_sync_file+0x0/0x580)
>           xfs_io-20280   [000] d.Z.  9900.748647: <stack trace>
>  => kprobe_trace_func
>  => kprobe_dispatcher
>  => kprobe_int3_handler
>  => exc_int3
>  => asm_exc_int3
>  => btrfs_sync_file
>  => do_fsync
>  => __x64_sys_fsync
>  => do_syscall_64
>  => entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe

Hmm, then there might be a problem in bpftrace or ebpf (need more info).
At least kprobes itself isn't broken.
I guess they check "in_nmi()" and skip such event?

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>