linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add EFI_CERT_X509

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <F1679B8B-F8F4-4B49-B728-27E8AE3F156C@oracle.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:41:04 -0700
From:   Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     dwmw2@...radead.org, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, masahiroy@...nel.org,
        michal.lkml@...kovi.net, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
        ardb@...nel.org, zohar@...ux.ibm.com, lszubowi@...hat.com,
        javierm@...hat.com, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx/mokx
 entries


> On Jan 28, 2021, at 8:16 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> Which tree do you envision this going through?  EFI or keyrings - or are you
> going to ask Linus to pull it directly?  I can pull it if it should go through
> the keyrings tree.

I was thinking it would go thru your tree, since a majority of the code
is contained within it.