[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <E5AD5576-1E14-4B7A-AFF6-B3BB2E9335DC@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:10:32 +0000
From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"Sun, Ning" <ning.sun@...el.com>,
"Dwarakanath, Kumar N" <kumar.n.dwarakanath@...el.com>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/8] x86/power: Restore Key Locker internal key from
the ACPI S3/4 sleep states
On Jan 28, 2021, at 02:34, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 6:47 PM Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> + keybackup_status = read_keylocker_backup_status();
>> + if (!(keybackup_status & BIT(0))) {
>> + pr_err("x86/keylocker: internal key restoration failed with %s\n",
>> + (keybackup_status & BIT(2)) ? "read error" : "invalid status");
>> + WARN_ON(1);
>> + goto disable_keylocker;
>> + }
>
> The above conditional could be consolidated a bit by using WARN():
>
> if (WARN(!(keybackup_status & BIT(0)), "x86/keylocker: internal key
> restoration failed with %s\n",
> (keybackup_status & BIT(2)) ? "read error" : "invalid status")
> goto disable_keylocker;
>
> Apart from this the patch LGTM.
Thanks for the review! I will make this change on my next revision.
Chang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists