lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:15:13 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: kprobes: rewrite in UAL

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:44 AM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
Linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Clang's integrated assembler only accepts UAL syntax, rewrite the
> instructions that were changed by RVCTv2.1.
>
> The document "Assembly language changes after RVCTv2.1" was very
> helpful.
>
> This exposed a bug in Clang's integrated assembler, which hopefully will
> land in clang-12, but is required to test this patch with LLVM_IAS=1.
>
> Link: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/dui0473/c/writing-arm-assembly-language/assembly-language-changes-after-rvctv2-1
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1271
> Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95586
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-arm.c | 288 ++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 144 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)

This mostly works, but I see one extra case in some configurations:


arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-arm.c:453:2: error: invalid instruction,
did you mean: swpb?
        TEST_R( "swpvsb r0, r",1,VAL1,", [sp]")
        ^
arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.h:235:2: note: expanded from macro 'TEST_R'
        TEST_INSTRUCTION(code1 #reg code2)              \
        ^
arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.h:155:17: note: expanded from macro
'TEST_INSTRUCTION'
        "50:    nop                                     \n\t"   \
                                                          ^
<inline asm>:20:5: note: instantiated into assembly here
        1:      swpvsb  r0, r1, [sp]
                ^~~~~~

Plus a lot of extra errors when building with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL,
as that uses tests in arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-thumb.c.

        Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ